Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Conservatives can't promise Floods Bill in first term

The Conservative floods minister has slammed the government’s progress in implementing Sir Michael Pitt’s recommendations following his report into the devastating 2007 floods, but said a Floods Bill was not certain in the first Queen’s Speech under David Cameron.

Shadow floods minister Anne McIntosh said: “One year on from Pitt and the consultation on the draft Floods Bill closed in July. It will be mid November before we know whether a real Bill will be programmed into the remaining months [in the Queen’s Speech].

“Pitt set out 92 recommendations, and of them only 16 have been completed in full, 26 in part and 44 not at all.

“14 do rely on primary legislation in a Floods Bill to proceed,” she said.

Last week flooding minister Huw Irranca-Davies said the Bill may not make the Queen’s Speech in the coming session but an ‘emergency’ bill could be passed to give specific bodies responsibility for flood water.

But NCE has learned that if a full Bill does not pass into the coming session of parliament, it is by no means certain in the first session of a Cameron government either - potentially delaying the Bill by two years.

“I am bidding for that [Parliamentary time] but there is a strong case to make,” she said, adding that an ‘emergency’ Bill to rush through would be supported. “But the things that can be put through should be. We need a tight Bill to give the recommendations teeth,” she said.

McIntosh said the government’s response to Pitt, in giving responsibility to the Environment Agency and Local Authorities was troubling because: “A lot of the budget comes from existing resources. I think we need to look at this.”

 

Readers' comments (1)

  • It sounds as though Labour will deliver a piecemeal approach and the Conservatives will do nothing. Ultimately it is the public who will be left exposed to the ever increasing threat of flooding, and Engineers who will have to try and deliver sustainable solutions without the legislation to back up their designs. Business as usual!

    It would be interesting to see what spin the Conservatives would put on it if they did not push the Bill through when they get in and then their was a repeat of the events of 2007....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.