Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Competitions' design flaw

Letters

The stunningly beautiful, structurally elegant and original new Tyne bridge and the awful, flawed London Millennium bridge were both the products of design competitions. This illustrates the weakness of this method of bridge selection.

There were over 50 entries for the Tyne bridge competition and more than 100 for the London bridge, so I find it difficult to believe there were not better alternatives available to the London judges.

Perhaps the solution to this problem is to ensure there is a majority of competent, experienced bridge engineers on competition judging panels.

It is OK to have laymen on the panel providing they are sensible people amenable to the logical views of the engineers.

John Bowerman (M), 81 The Balk, Walton, Wakefield, WF2 6JX

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.