Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Common problem


The phrase 'lowest common denominator' used in Mr Acton's letter to (NCE 5 October 2000) is typical of the outdated attitude of some members of the Institution, towards the non chartered backbone of the civil engineering industry. It represents a belief that 'one' cannot possibly accept the 'low common' sector into a single grade of membership with the elite.

This appears to be echoed by fellows writing in the same issue, upset at the proposals even though the distinction between CEng and IEng will still exist. They should remember that a broad spectrum of expertise within their individual organisations has enabled them to reach their exalted positions.

The present Council should be commended for its efforts in modernising the membership grades and should not be swayed by a minority who feel that their positions are under threat from such proposals.

William Paton IEng AMICE 1 LocharPlace, Gardenhall, East Kilbride, G75 8BX

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.