Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Code word


I would just like to clarify two points in your article, New Eurocodes will encourage innovation, (NCE 7 July).

First, the quoted figure of 14 Eurocode parts required to design a bridge relates to steel-concrete composite bridges, not all bridges. This is because of the extensive cross references that Eurocode 4 makes to parts of Eurocode 2 and Eurocode 3.

Secondly, the results of pilot studies conducted by Atkins did indeed reveal engineers were 'initially shocked' at the number of documents and the code language, but they very quickly got used to this change.

This latter point is extremely important and highlights that, in general, Eurocodes are different to use, not more difficult to use.

Chris Hendy (M), head of bridge design and technology, Chris.Hendy@atkinsglobal. com

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.