Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Class struggle

Letters

Given that the proposed merger with IMechE has been billed as good for the future of the ICE, I'm confused as to why students, graduates and technicians will not be allowed to vote on the matter. Surely the future of the Institution is its younger members and ostracising these very people from such an important decision can only have detrimental effects on the Institution's future.

I'm only in the second year of my degree and as such do not have the technical knowledge of a chartered member but I still take interest in the Institution by attending local events and suchlike. I therefore feel that all members of all grades should have the opportunity to express their opinion where it counts - at the ballot box.

No one would argue that giving women and the lower classes the vote hurt democracy in the national sense so why in the 21st century is the ICE still continuing to discriminate based on nothing but the class of one's membership?

Robert Jeans, University of Bath, ab3rdj@bath. ac. uk

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.