Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Class issue

LETTERS

Your report on SARTOR (NCE 30 September) suggests that a course intake of 40 is the critical factor - this is not true. The key issue is the average class size.

In the Integrated School of Engineering established at Aston, our former departmental system having been eliminated three years ago, we are able to achieve this through considerable amounts of common teaching. We provide accredited (BEng and MEng) engineering programmes in all key disciplines and related areas so our total intake is some 300 students. While they are not taught in such a large group, the economies of scale mean that individual intakes are lesscritical than the total intake.

Integrated teaching brings additional benefits to the students, as identified in SARTOR 3, by exposing them to a range of disciplines and encouraging team-based activities.

Professor RJ Kettle (M), Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham B4 7ET

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.