Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Civils must be involved in advice


In your article Spending cuts reduced broken rail repairs (NCE 26 October), you refer to Project Destiny, a 1998 report on Railtrack's spending priorities produced by American management consultant McKinsey. This recommended the scaling down of renewals work.

What qualifications do these management consultants have that allow them to give advice on rail maintenance? If the answer is none, then what advice did McKinsey seek from suitably qualified/experienced civil engineers? If also none, then what responsibility rests with McKinsey for providing advice with such devastating consequences? Here I am certain the answer is none.

If we assume that no qualified/experienced engineers were involved in Project Destiny, how can we (as a profession and a society) allow such important decisions to be made on unqualified advice?

Surely something must be done to emphasise the role of the civil engineer in providing useful advice, founded on education, training, and experience.

Dr Cliff Ohl (G)

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs