Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

CHAS and save

Letters

As a local government officer I share Philip Kirby's view (Letters 11 January) about the time and money wasted in unnecessary duplication where health and safety prequalication is required.

The Contractor Health and Safety Assessment Scheme (CHAS) is the largest of its type in the UK with more than 200 members and nearly 15,000 registered contractors and consultants and is going from strength to strength.

We have reached an important crossroads with the introduction of Gershon efficiency savings in the public sector and the introduction of the core criteria for assessment of competency in the CDM regulations, which come into force in April. Many clients now appreciate the savings from using our scheme and the past two weeks alone have seen 14 new members.

Kirby's letter criticises local government, yet the same can be said of main contractors who also use their own prequalication standards for their approved list. Many main or major contractors have acknowledged this and have joined the scheme.

John Murphy, CHAS scheme manager, john.murphy@merton. gov. uk

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.