Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Centre point

Letters

Being a relatively old and grumpy and male, but always an engineer trying to take a broad interest, I continue to mourn the sad loss of 'epicentre'. Once a proud specialist technical word, it has been misunderstood by the media (and adopted by everyone else) until it is now no more than a smart-sounding synonym for 'centre'.

The battle must now be truly lost since even you said in your 13 October issue that 'The [Pakistan] quake's epicentre was 10km below ground'. I know language must move on, but to enrich not to devalue.

Does it make me sad- Yes. Is it important- Not in comparison with the tragic natural events it accompanies. Will I stop getting aggrieved about it- Not at my age.

Jon Balley (M) jonballey@tiscali. co. uk Editor's note: Thank you Mr Balley. Epicentre means the point on the Earth's surface directly above the focus of an earthquake. The word we should have used was hypocentre - the point within the earth that is the centre of an earthquake.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.