Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Centre for Cities: abandon congestion charging

Centre for Cities, which has supported congestion charge bids by both Manchester and Cambridge for Transport Innovation Fund (TIF) cash, has made a policy U-turn and now called for the government to abandon its insistence on charging.

The Government has set aside £200M per year to be invested in TIF until 2019, a total pot of some £2bn.

Schemes that want to bid for the money must include a congestion charging portion, a policy that has been heavily criticised by both LIberal Democrat and Conservative MPs.

Manchester’s bid for £1bn of TIF cash failed in a public referendum in 2008.

Centre for Cities now say the effects of the recession have made it more important to invest now. It says money would be better spent being invested in public transport schemes, and the congestion charging criteria should be dropped if no cities adopt TIF this year.

Director of the Centre for Cities, Dermot Finch, said: “Cities like Manchester and Edinburgh have found congestion charging a tough sell. Other cities considering a charge - like Cambridge, Reading and Bristol - are undecided. If there are no takers by the end of the year, the Government should call it a day on its current road user charging push.

“A tough post-recession fiscal climate means central government transport grants are likely to dwindle post 2011.  The next Government should use the congestion charging pot to start up a new fund for transport projects, together with councils and the private sector.  This fund would keep UK cities’ moving and help shift the national economy towards recovery.”

The report says the dire economic conditions will leave cities virtually bankrupt and unable to invest in public transport once the recession is over. The report recommends:

  • By the end of 2009, transport ministers should liberate the £1bn funding earmarked for congestion charging and seek cross party consensus to safeguard the money for city transport improvements.

  • After the general election, the next Government should create a £4bn Urban Transport Investment Fund, using the congestion charging pot as a starting point.

The Centre also says that public transport has been a low priority for government, spending 18 times more on the VAT cut, “Than on bringing forward transport investment projects, which create jobs, boost the UK’s economic competitiveness and cut congestion,” reads a Centre for Cities release.

They also say that more than 70% of commuters in England’s six largest urban areas outside London still travel to work by car.

 

Readers' comments (1)

  • Becouse trains and buses are to expensive and les comfortable than personal transport.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.