Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Cardiff Bay Barrage: the other view


The press always highlights the bad news rather than the good, and that has happened in your article of the Auditor General for Wales's report on the Cardiff Bay Barrage (NCE 6 July). Your article ignores the following points that are made in the report:

The construction of the barrage and the management of the project, including the cost, represent considerable achievements given its size and complexity.

Progress made represents a sound performance on the part of the Cardiff Bay Development Corporation, particularly in view of the need to deal with cost increases that were due to factors outside its control.

A minimum, £170M/annum is being returned to the public purse from revenue directly attributable to the developments in Cardiff Bay.

Shortly before the Corporation was wound up, it negotiated with Balfour Beatty/Costain a full and final contract settlement of £120M.

This compares well with the provision made for the construction cost of the project of some £114M in 1994.

Your report gives the impression of a damming report by the Auditors. Far from it.

Who can recall a major project where construction costs increased by 5% over a five year construction period and who can recall the final account of a major project being settled before issue of the completion certificate?

D Crompton (F),

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.