Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Canary Wharf could survive jet impact - designer

News

CANARY WHARF, Britain's tallest building, would not have collapsed if it had been hit by a plane, according to its structural designer.

'Canary Wharf has a high degree of structural redundancy.

The building would not collapse, ' said Waterman managing director Bob Campbell.

He said the London skyscraper was not designed specifically for impact from aircraft but that that it 'was very robust with a high degree of structural redundancy.

'On the faþade you could take out two columns without a detrimental effect, ' he added. But Campbell pointed out that the 55 storey 244m building is not as tall as the World Trade Center towers.

Campbell said that fire protection measures and structural codes governing skyscrapers are likely to be revisited after the attacks.

WS Atkins director and head of structural engineering Mike Otlet agreed. 'I am sure we will now go back to designing structures with more structural redundancy. In the UK you design for the loss of a critical or a limited number of critical elements. After this, we may be designing for the loss of more columns, ' said Otlet.

But this would not mean a massive increase to the cost of buildings. 'The structure accounts for around 20% of the cost of a building and a lot of structure is in the ground. So extra redundancy in the superstructure is not a big issue of cost, ' said Otlet.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.