Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Camera obscurer

LETTERS: READERS WRITE

In response to the NCE500 poll on speed cameras (NCE 14 June), I am pleased to see that the majority of engineers involved in this poll agreed that cameras improve road safety.

However, I would like to confirm the correct procedure with cost recovery.

The revenue received from offenders is only used to match the actual expenditure by authorities in purchasing and operating the cameras. All additional funds over and above that amount are returned to the Lord Chancellor's department at the end of the financial year.

For these reasons safety cameras are not, as some people believe, a way of printing money but are an effective tool for combating the increase in road traffic accidents. This is proven by the eight pilot authorities who have conducted the hypothecation experiment. This information will be released before national roll out.

Derek Johnstone EngTech (TM), senior technician, Lincolnshire Road Safety Partnership derek. johnstone@lincolnshir e. gov. uk

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.