Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Interserve costs to exit EfW market soar to £160M


Interserve is setting aside £160M to cover the cost of exiting the energy from waste (EfW). This is more than from its previous estimate of £70M.

Last year Viridor terminated Interserve’s contract for the glasgow recycling and renewable energy project was terminated. Doosan Babcock has now taken Interserve’s place.

In a business update, Interserve said: “We have considered the implications of this development with our legal advisers and expect a lengthy period of litigation to ensue. Alongside this exercise we have continued to undertake a detailed review of operational developments on the other contracts in our exited EfW business, including the impact of the entering into administration by our principal gasification subcontractor, Energos, together with the likelihood and timing of potential recoveries and claims from third parties.”

In the light of this, the board said that the £70M set aside for losses with the business is no longer adequate, and it now expects costs to reach £160M.

It said the losses from the EfW contracts have increased average net debt, which was £390M during 2016, and is now anticipated to be around £450M for this year. To mitigate this, Interserve has set up new lending arrangements.


Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.