Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Highways England reveals £92M specialist consultant spend

highways england generic

Highways England spent more than £26M on specialist consultancy services from Arup and £18M on TRL services last year, new figures released have revealed.

A response to a Freedom of Information (FOI) request on consultancy spend has been published by Highways England. It reveals the roads body spent £92,415,913.32 in 2017 via its Specialist Professional and Technical Services (SPaTS) framework during the year 2017.

Arup’s bill was the largest, with Highways England spending more than £26M with the firm via the Lot covering technical consultancy, engineering advice, and research and innovation. Its second highest spend was with TRL at more than £18M in the same category.

The breakdown of Highways England’s 2017 SPaTS spend is as follows:



 Lot 1 | Technical consultancy, engineering advice, research & innovation      




 Atkins CH2M


 Pell Frischmann






 Lot 2 | Commercial Services






 Faithful & Gould


 Mott MacDonald


 Turner & Townsend




 Lot 3 | Dispute Resolution




 Lot 4 | Insurance Advice & Brokerage


 Willis Ltd


 Lot 5 | Procurement Advice




Mott MacDonald


Rowsell Wright


Turner & Townsend


Lot 6 | Post Implementation Evaluation






A Highways England spokesperson said: “We are delivering £15bn of investment in our roads to increase safety, improve journey times and reduce congestion for millions of drivers who use our roads every day.

“In order to successfully deliver the broad range of schemes within the Roads Investment Strategy we need to seek advice from external technical experts and specialists where no in-house capability of a similar nature exists.”





Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.