Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Budget cuts could threaten future use of Olympic

London's Olympic Park risks becoming a white elephant if budget pressures force designers to cut corners, one London politician warned this week.
London Assembly Green Party member Darren Johnson said that he feared the government might follow Athens' example in responding to cost overruns on London 2012, stripping out vital community-linked legacy projects.'In Athens the focus was just on getting the stadium built and plans to match the post-Olympic infrastructure to the local community failed to materialise,' said Johnson. 'While there were grand plans in the bid documents for a legacy for east London and the environment, my concern is that when costs start to spiral these plans will get jettisoned.' However, an Olympic Delivery Authority (ODA) spokesman this week rejected his fears. 'This is a regeneration project with a Games overlay. There is no way we would forsake [regeneration] to cut costs, because it is central to what we are doing.'Concern that the government had hugely underestimated the cost of building the Olympic Park were raised by former ODA chairman Jack Lemley last week. He claimed that he quit the project because of local politics and the spiralling cost of the project, which was originally budgeted at a capital cost of £2.4bn at 2004 prices but could now top £5bn.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.