Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

BP ordered to provide cap reopening plan

The US government ordered BP to provide a plan for reopening its capped well in the Gulf of Mexico after engineers found seepage and possible methane gas near the leak site.

Earlier yesterday, BP officials expressed hope that extended tests on the cap which began on Thursday could continue until relief wells are in place to permanently shut off the flow of oil.

But the discovery of seepage could mean there are still leaks in the damaged well.

The US government’s plan is to pipe oil to the surface, which would ease pressure on the well but would require up to three more days of oil spilling into the Gulf.

Doug Suttles, BP’s chief operating officer, said last night: “No one associated with this whole activity … wants to see any more oil flow into the Gulf of Mexico.

“Right now we don’t have a target to return the well to flow.”

Retired Coast Guard Admiral Thad Allen, who is in charge of the White House’s reponse to the spill, ordered BP to provide a plan for reopening the well by 1am today (UK time).

In a letter to BP managing director Bob Dudley he said: “When seeps are detected, you are directed to marshal resources, quickly investigate, and report findings to the government in no more than four hours.

“I direct you to provide me a written procedure for opening the choke valve as quickly as possible without damaging the well should hydrocarbon seepage near the well head be confirmed.”

Readers' comments (1)

  • The real problem is if the "fault" is a crack or hole in the cemented annulus around the casing much lower down, which even after the intend sealing of the cased bored via the relief well could still leak. Also is the original major oil/gas leak via the bore or this annulus?
    Having said that we don't know what the new problem is or how big it is! It could be a methane leak via an existing natural fissure that no one would have previously looked fordiscovered or realised was there, or it could be a leak which often occurs, but has never been looked for before, located immediately adjacent to the bore and generated by normal drilling practice.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.