Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Box clever?

Letters

In the box headed 'Seen to be fair' in your Camera Controversy article (NCE 22 January), the implication is given that cameras must be brightly coloured, clearly visible and that the public must be able to find out where they are situated.

The article ignores the fact that many police forces use mobile cameras as speed traps and that in any case failure on the part of the authorities to follow the guidelines does not give rise to any defence in court.

Perhaps if RoSPA stopped 'fuming' and helped to create an honest official attitude, the philosophical chasm could start to be bridged.

Tom Moss (M), Tom.Moss@bannerholdings.

co. uk

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.