Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Boroughs fi ght extended Crossrail working hours


WORK ON Crossrail will cause more disruption than other building sites in London, because work will be allowed to carry on for an extra two hours each day, local authorities warned this week.

Enabling legislation for the project allows for Crossrail sites to stay open between 7am and 7pm, while most other London sites are restricted to work between 8am and 6pm.

London boroughs along the route are to push for a cut in proposed working hours in evidence to be submitted shortly to the transport select committee.

The committee is to examine the Crossrail bill in the autumn.

Corporation of London highways and transportation director Joe Weiss told NCE: 'Crossrail should be constructed to the standard hours that we allow for all development in the city.

As soon as you give way on this we will have every developer banging on our door.' The Corporation is also in talks with the Crossrail promoter company to change the location of tunnels routed directly under the Barbican housing estate after residents claimed tunnelling could cause subsidence and excessive noise.

Residents were concerned at plans to build a 180m crossover cavern using the New Austrian Tunnelling Method (NATM).

Construction of the cavern would also involve running a 24 hour concrete batching plant on Aldersgate Street. And this is the point where spoil will be removed.

Weiss is due to meet Crossrail offi ials in the next week to discuss an alternative site for the cavern closer to Moorgate Underground station.

A Crossrail spokesman said that working hours and construction near the Barbican were both up for discussion and nothing was set in stone.

'We have a proposal which will then be modifi d to suit each local authority, ' said a spokesman. 'I'm sure there will be deals made provided it doesn't make the project more expensive.'

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.