Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Boris renews support for new London airport

London mayor Boris Johnson has backed a report calling for a brand new south-east England airport.

Overseen by Transport for London deputy chairman Daniel Moylan, the report said the UK economy would suffer and London lose jobs to its European competitors unless a new hub airport was created in south-east England.

The report does not specify a particular site for a new airport but another Johnson-commissioned report later this year will consider a range of locations for new airport capacity. This will include options for a new airport which could be in the Thames estuary, as well as consideration of existing sites with the exception of Heathrow.

While the coalition Government has ruled out new runways in south-east England, Johnson has long favoured a new airport in the Thames estuary. His backing for expansion not only puts him at possible loggerheads with the Government but also with those opposing airport growth, including residents’ groups and conservationists.

Heathrow ‘losing out’

The report said the number of destinations that can be directly accessed from Heathrow was now 157 compared to 224 from Paris’s Charles de Gaulle airport and 235 from Frankfurt. It said that this showed that London’s only hub airport was losing out to other European airports, which if sustained could have long-term damaging effects for the economies of London and the UK.

The report also said that runway use was typically 70% to 75% at major European hub airports, but at Heathrow and Gatwick airports it was approximately 99%, which was causing delays and reliability problems. Heathrow is handling up to 75,000 more passengers a day than it was built for, it added.

The report said the Government was forecasting considerable growth in aviation demand within environmental limits. To ensure that this growth was accommodated to the benefit of the economy of London and the UK without harmful environmental consequences, the report called on the Government to adopt a fresh approach and develop a comprehensive strategy for aviation growth for London and the UK.

“No other city even approaches the volume of passengers handled at London’s airports but we need to start planning for a brand new airport that can help meet the ever-increasing demand for aviation and act as a hub, particularly to the rest of the UK,” said Johnson. But he reiterated this cannot be at any cost and reaffirmed his opposition to expansion of Heathrow.

Boris on ‘collision course’

Anti-Heathrow airport expansion group Hacan has claimed that Mr Johnson is “on a collision course” with the Government over his aviation policy and that there is no business case for a new airport.

London Assembly Green Party member Darren Johnson said: “There has been significant opposition to this idea from local people, politicians and from environmental campaigners. The mayor would better represent Londoners’ interests by pushing for investment in alternatives to aviation, such as improved and more affordable rail services.”

Readers' comments (2)

  • Just expand heathrow! It's clearly necessary. FFS

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I discussed this with the taxi driver on my most recent surface approach to LHR to make a major contribution to climate change and bhis view was 'this area is already spoilt so why not expand LHR?' This is a valid view but ever since I landed on the offshore hammerhead runway in the Seychelles in 1976 I have felt that such an arrangement offers major benefits in terms of nuisance to residents, land use and ditching and I don't think the potential benefits of the Thames estuary in terms of the above and more importantly the potential for expansion and synergy of tidal storage and hydro power should be dismissed without thorough assessment. If you think solar power is good you should see what the moon can do. An astronomer could tell you today what power can generated in any hour of any day during the next 200 years and it would also mitigate the need for Don Quixote blots on the landscape.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.