Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Bombs - a way


From your article (NCE last week) I am surprised that unexploded World War II bombs are considered a threat and could undermine development of the Thames Gateway. What happened to the Construction (Design & Management) regulations?

In a similar development for Dartford Park on the south side of the Thames estuary, with which I was involved in my role a planning supervisor, the regulations clearly indicated that a UXB survey and an archaeological survey would be among requirements before, and a necessary part of, any site investigation.

There are plenty of specialists in both these fields who can advise and undertake the necessary surveys.

In addition, any design risk assessment should include reference to the possibility of UXB in these circumstances, thereby alerting all parties to this at a later stage.

Lance Fogg, managing consultant, highways & transportation, Bank Chambers, Faulkner Street, Manchester M1 4EH

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.