Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Bear in mind the slide path


The investigation report into the Injaka Bridge collapse (NCE 8/15 August) is well worth a read by all those involved in major bridges - and it is easily accessible via NCE's website.

The source of the failure was the use of a slide path away from the webs of the bridge, caused in this case by a catalogue of errors, inexperience and confusion.

Hopefully this could not happen to UK engineers. However, a similar problem could arise from the current fashion for unusual forms.

We recently completed an alternative design using an incrementally launched method for a bridge across the estuary in Dublin.

The bridge has a curved soffit rather than the normal flat profile. The curvature meant that slide bearings had to be inclined and that normal tolerance errors could shift the slide path significantly from its intended line towards the thin curved slab. For this bridge the amount of movement could be calculated and allowed for in the design.

One half of the bridge has now been launched and the second deck is well on its way.

David Collings, technical director, Benaim (UK), David.Collings@benaimgroup . com

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.