Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Beal and end all?


AN Beal (NCE 18/25 August) appears to blame design and build contractors for the absence of designers on site.

In my experience it is actually clients who are responsible - at least, those clients who are aware that they have a choice.

When I worked for Halcrow (I am now retired), we advised clients who wanted to follow the D&B route that the presence of the designer on site was of great benefit to the project, and that we proposed to ensure his participation by making it a requirement of the contractor's QA system that the designer had to certify that his designs had been accurately reflected in the works as constructed.

Some thought this was an excellent idea and the proposal was adopted; others asked if it would cost them any more, to which we said that it probably would, and they promptly vetoed it.

As with everything else in life, if you make all your decisions based on price, you will end up with goods or services that satisfy that criterion - and that is probably all that will be satisfactory about them.

Colin Reed, reed@sarum13.freeserve. co. uk

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.