Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Barke up wrong tree

Reader's write - Letters

It is probably fair to assume that Chris Barke (NCE 17 June) has not had to manage a highway maintenance budget in recent years.

As, until recently, service manager responsible for highway maintenance in a large city for 12 years, I oversaw a gradual move away from a large annual surface dressing programme, which had always been unpopular in an entirely urban area, and had been seen as generally 'cheap and nasty' for the most part.

However, there remained a place for this method, but as a relatively small part of a programme which used a widening product mix, including thin surfacings and a variety of surface treatments, including slurry seals.

Surface dressing remained the cheapest process available, and does have significant environmental benefits by enabling otherwise worn surfaces to 'hang-on' for longer, with little or no generation of waste materials on site.

With no let-up in the pressure on budgets, it is likely to continue in use to some extent, doing a useful job on carriageway surfaces which need some attention, but would never otherwise reach the top of a very crowded list.

John Tedstone (M), johntedstone@hotmail. com

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.