Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


Originally conceived as a low technology floor construction method that needed no skilled labour, Pal-Kal has been very popular with contractors who rely on casual labour. Its basic weakness is the risk of a cold joint between the first 50mm of concrete poured and the rest of the concrete in the slab.

This first layer contains the main reinforcing mesh. Once the concrete is poured, workers move onto the slab to position the inverted trough section corrugated steel void formers. These are supposed to be pushed 1015mm down into the hardening concrete before the rest of the concrete is poured and an upper layer of anti-crack mesh placed.

After a series of failures in shear along the cold joint the system was modified to include hairpin shear links between the void formers close to the end supports. These were also supposed to be pushed into the green concrete of the first layer. These modifications failed to convince the engineering authorities that Pal-Kal could comply with Israeli building codes.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs