Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

BAA Stansted plan rejected


MAJOR INFRASTRUCTURE designers will be forced to show the climate change impacts of their schemes after a landmark planning refusal last week, environmentalists claimed.

Uttlesford District Council this week refused BAA's plan to double capacity at Stansted Airport on climate change grounds.

It said that following Sir Nicholas Stern's government commissioned climate change review it was unable to approve the scheme until government aviation policy was claried.

Friends of the Earth planning advisor Hugh Ellis said forthcoming airport expansion applications at Heathrow, Manchester, Bristol, Nottingham, Birmingham, also faced rejection unless climate change mitigation is included in scheme design.

Climate change impact is going to become a mainstream part of design within 12 months, ' said Ellis. 'The politics is moving that fast and civil engineers will play a pivotal role in this.' Department for Communities & Local Government is expected shortly to publish planning guidance which accounts for climate change impact.

Uttlesford District Council threw out the Stansted application saying it expected the government to cut its target to more than double airline passenger growth by 2030.

'In the light of the Stern Review and the increasing evidence of the adverse effects of climate change, it would be premature to grant planning permission in advance of clarication by the government as to whether its response to the Stern Review and other recent research will include direct implications for the aviation industry beyond the provisions of the Air Transport White Paper, ' said the council.

BAA said it would appeal against the decision.

'BAA argues that there is nothing in the Stern Review or the government's potential response to it that could reasonably lead the council to suppose that the government will be calling for a halt to any further growth at Stansted.'

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.