Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Architect role

Letters

It is becoming increasingly clear that London's Millennium Bridge will never open for unrestricted public access. As the Tyne footbridge is now nearing completion (NCE last week) it would be interesting to compare the relative roles played by each of the professions in the concept and development of the two designs.

I have no personal experience of either structure but I suggest that London's bridge looks like it was conceived by an architect on the basis of appearance alone with the engineer simply told to make it work.

The Tyne bridge on the other hand was obviously an engineering concept developed with the, no doubt valuable, assistance of an architect.

The result of these alternative attitudes to design is that we have one very elegant and functional design and one complete disaster which will haunt both professions for many years.

A bridge is an engineering structure and the role of the architect should be confined to designing the handrails and choosing the colour scheme.

Arthur Newton (F) Hegglehead, Hutton Roof, Penrith, Cumbria CA11 OXS

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.