Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Arch villain?

Letters

The Gerrards Cross Tesco railway arch debacle is a poor reflection on our profession (NCE 18/25 August).

A three-pinned arch is a statically determinate structure which is very easy to analyse.

Unlike a deeply covered tunnel, it is very sensitive to the applied horizontal and vertical loading from back-fill round it.

The working drawing must have made a clear statement showing the thickness and disposition of the daily layers of back-fill, its type, moisture content, compacted density and shear angle. In the past, each layer would have been illustrated on the drawing and coloured-coded to avoid confusion.

The pin joint itself appears to be a male/female longitudinal shallow curved socket faced with stainless steel. For the expected maximum shear force at this joint with a maximum central deflection of 200mm, it looks as though one arch could slide down relative to the other.

For total, all-shear security, the joint should be a clutch or a mechanical knuckle.

The Chiltern Railway has become a tremendous success.

Why have rail travellers waited seven weeks for an answer to such a clear problem- If it had been a motorway it would have been cleared in two days!

Christopher Wallis (M), 2, Fern Cottages, Little Marlow, Bucks, SL7 3SE

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.