Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Anger as Olympic stadium procured without shortlist

News

CONSULTANTS WERE this week 'seething' at the Olympic Delivery Authority's (ODA) decision to scrap plans to shortlist bidders for the London 2012 main stadium.

They warned that the decision last Friday to hand the £242M design and construct job to the Arsenal Emirates stadium team of Sir Robert McAlpine, Buro Happold and HOK Sport robbed London of innovative design.

They warned that without competition there was a risk of serious cost ination.

The ODA originally said it would shortlist three to six bidders for the stadium in September. The idea was that they would help it work out the design and scope of the project, with a successful team selected in January 2007 (NCE 27 July).

But after a three week delay in publishing this shortlist, the ODA last week moved straight to preferred bidder stage, claiming that only one of the bids met its prequalication criteria.

'The sad thing is that London has no choice on its stadium, ' said one design expert .

'There's no selection panel, no different taste. It's a dictated solution.' But ODA chief executive David Higgins defended the decision and brushed aside cost fears.

'We will be putting in place appropriate cost controls to ensure that budgets are managed properly and that value for money is achieved, ' he said.

From the winning bidders, HOK senior principal John Barrow also defended the decision and maintained that design innovation would not suffer.

'I don't think it will weaken or lessen design in any way, ' he said.

But this week many structural engineers and architects strongly condemned the decision. One unsuccessful bidder said the ODA's decision had seriously dented its credibility with the engineering and construction industry.

'This decision sets a dangerous precedent for the rest of the Olympic procurement process, ' he said. 'We have spent a lot of time and money going after this, and if the ODA already has a good idea of the rms they want on their projects, many companies will think 'why bother?' on future venues.' The brief for the stadium is to create an 80,000 seat venue for host track and eld events and the opening and closing ceremonies. After the Games it will reduce in size to 25,000 as it becomes a venue for a variety of sporting, cultural and community events.

Other firms bidding to get on the shortlist included Arup with German contractor Alpine Bau Deutschland; Whitbybird with architect Ryder HKS and US contractor Hunt Construction Group; URS Corporation with architects Foster & Partners, Martha Schwartz, AFL Architects and project manager Gleeds. Architect Richard Rogers was bidding alone.

NCE understands that even the ODA's delivery partner CLM is unhappy with the ODA's decision as it has now been denied the opportunity to have a signi cant say in who builds the stadium.

Consultants contacted by NCE this week were also unanimous in their criticism of the ODA's stadium procurement process, in particular, its decision to appoint its Olympic Delivery Partner in parallel with the tender for the stadium construction contract.

The result, they said, was that major contractors involved in the bid for the delivery partner role - Balfour Beatty, Bovis Lend Lease, Amec and eventually delivery partner winner Laing O'Rourke - had effectively been ruled out of bidding for the stadium.

This decision made it difcult for big name stadium designers like SKM nd a suitable contractor with which to bid, while others opted to bid for the design and build job without a contractor on board (NCE 10 August).

'The timing of the Delivery Partner appointment completely skewed the market, ' said one unsuccessful bidder.

The winning team was the only one with a British contractor and included HOK and Buro Happold, which had worked on the master plan which underpinned the Olympic bid. It was consequently considered the out and out favourite for the project (NCE 7 September).

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.