Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Aiming to keep standards high


The proposal to close the gap between AMICE and MICE (NCE last week) is likely to lead to yet further confusion over the status of our qualified engineers. Just as our trainees are coming to terms with the new SARTOR regulations, and for many accepting their fate as associate members, it would appear that the Institution is about to alter the rules again.

The differential between MICE (IEng) and MICE (CEng) is indeed very subtle and while in theory the proposal would promote the grade of the incorporated engineer, it does little to elevate the status of chartership and hence our status in society. If after such a short period of operation under the new SARTOR rules the ICE Council felt the need to tinker with the grades again would it not be better to promote full membership (MICE) as the standard grade with an elevated grade above that to represent the elite.

Michael Rogers (M)

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.