Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Advert lacks originality


I am writing with respect to the 'Brick' advertisements which have been recently cropping up on our television screens.

Credit should be extended to the commissioners and originators of these adverts. It is very satisfying as an engineer to see the profession and industry as a whole being promoted in such a positive light, particularly as such inspiring examples of major engineering projects - such as the Millennium Stadium and 'Blinking Eye' bridge - are being used to demonstrate to the wider public what the industry is about. It almost looks sexy.

However, upon seeing this advertisement for the first time, my initial reaction was one of disappointment, as the end product seems to resemble the result of a drunken dalliance between the advertising campaigns for teaching and the army. So much so, that at the end of the advert I was half expecting to sign up for a stint with the services, rather than consider a career in the construction industry.

As image is everything within advertising, should we have expected more in the way of innovation and originality? I would be extremely curious to see what others thought.

David Lavin, david. lavin@ntlworld. com

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.