Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Add your comments to delay protocol


There has been much publicity in the NCE and elsewhere about projects that fail to be completed on time and to budget. The worst cases grab the headlines and give the construction industry a bad name.

Given the nature of our industry it is inevitable that some projects will be varied and delayed but we ought to manage these changes much better than we currently do.

The lack of a common approach about how to handle changes is in itself a frequent cause of dispute.

NCE readers may not be aware that the Society of Construction Law has recently prepared a groundbreaking new protocol that aims to provide a 'best practice' guide for how to record delay and determine extensions of time and compensation for delay.

The protocol is currently in draft form and the subject of public consultation. The consultation period has just been extended to the end of February and I encourage anyone interested to participate in the consultation.

The text of the draft Protocol is available on the Society's website at www. eotprotocol. com.

Jim Pragnell, jim. pragnell@jacobs. com

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.