Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Act of betrayal

Letters

Antony Oliver writes (NCE last week) that the value of ICE membership has been on the wane for many years.

At the same time I cannot remember a year when the cost of membership has not increased by more than the rate of infl ation.

This reeks of a lack of accountability that is reinforced by an unexpected 600% escalation in the 2005 operating deficit.

A clue to the problem can be found in Tom Foulkes' statements that what we have had is a group of well meaning amateurs and that professionalism does not come for free. The ICE is not amateur and while its performance may have been amateur it has not come free.

I will oppose any rise in fees above the rate of inflation until such time as there is clear evidence of a change in this self-serving attitude and an acceptance of the financial constraints that most of us live under. For example, a firm commitment to freeze fees in subsequent years.

Ken Thornton (M), REC.Thornton@ukgateway.

net

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.