Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

A hard lesson for engineering

I was perplexed at the claim for engineering success at Terminal 5 (Comment, NCE last week).

The problems experienced at Heathrow occur all too frequently with software systems and it needs a change of attitude to counter it in engineering as well.

This is all about understanding the customer chain from the start of the project. Failure of engineering elements to ensure that the overall programme has the necessary operational elements built in will inevitably lead to "guilt by association".

Terminal 5 is a public project. What customers expected was a working airport, with everything that entails. Engineering is just one element of that supply chain.

It is critical that robust handover plans are developed and jointly owned from project inception. The attitude of "my bit is okay – it's someone else's fault" is just not good enough. DAVID WHITE (AM),

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.