Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

A carrot and stick approach to safety

Letters

Clients do indeed have a major role to play in health and safety but so too do the operatives.

Having monitored safety checks between the designers and the contractors on two major pharmaceutical projects, we found the CDM regulations, though laudable, had minimal effect on those who have the accidents. It is a theoretical solution to a practical problem.

On these two projects the clients were prepared to invest up front in a carrot and stick approach. By providing substantial incentives and close supervision by safety officers, excellent safety figures were achieved. On a total cost basis they were deemed a financial success, although that is hard to substantiate.

However, long term attitudes were hardly dented. People soon revert to their old ways.

As with the wearing of seat belts, it will probably take legislation to change attitudes.

The clients who benefit from the building work should be required to put the money up front for incentive schemes and close independent supervision. This is where the legislation would probably be required. Then reduced premiums should provide the carrot for 'safe' clients.

Ian Jarvis (F), 41 Cartmel Drive, Dunstable, Beds LU6 3PT

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.