Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

A breach of human rights?


There can be little doubt that increased capital and maintenance investment to our water courses and catchments is necessary. Clarity of responsibility and control remains problematic although the Environment Agency should now be better placed to fight its corner and exploit recent flooding experience in its widest context. Was that done for Bewdley?

An aspect of the work not mentioned is the probability of the defence itself initiating flooding to the deliberately unprotected side at low level overtopping.

That is surely rare as a deliberate engineering act?

Have engineers considered the possibility of human rights actions by the unprotected and perhaps an injunction restraining the Agency from erecting the demountable defence? Has the council and other taxing authorities properly considered the rights of the other bank occupier who may well be financing the scheme?

B Walton (F), 8 Milford House, Portsmouth Road, Milford, Surrey GU8 5HJ

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.