Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

38,000 segments for Hinkley tunnels to be made

Hinkley C

Details of the three massive tunnels Costain is to build for the £18bn Hinkley Point C nuclear power station in Somerset have been revealed, as the contractor gears up to start manufacturing the concrete lining segments.

The information about the plant is some of the first to emerge from the mega-project regarding its construction. Just the work of the plant alone gives an indication of the enormity of the job.

A total of 38,000 concrete segments need to be made for the three Hinkley tunnels, amounting to 83,000m³ of concrete. Two of the three tunnels will supply the water for cooling the reactor and the third is the water outlet.

To build the segments, Costain has applied for planning permission to build a temporary precast concrete batching facility at Avonmouth Docks, further up the Severn Estuary from Hinkley. It will be used for four years. A decision on the application will be taken by Bristol City Council’s development control committee tomorrow (Wednesday).

hinkley concrete factory

Hinkley precast concrete facility

Source: Costain

The tunnels will be 20m below the seabed, according to information in the main committee report. The two intake tunnels will be 3.4km and 3.5km long and 6m in diameter. The outlet tunnel will be 1.8km long and 7m in diameter. The plant will need to operate on a 24 hour basis, producing 600 segments a week at peak production. Segments will weigh 4.8t or 4.2t depending on where in the tunnel they are used.

The plant will also make the six head units for the tunnels.

The Health & Safety Executive (HSE) has expressed concern about the facility. It says the facility’s location will put people are within too short a distance of neighbouring sites which can store hazardous substances. Although the sites concerned do have consent to store hazardous substances, two have been demolished and the other three have not stored such substances for four years.

The HSE also says the development has a low probability of a major accident involving explosives close to shipping berths which have explosives handling licences. The Council wants the port authority to adapt its explosives management policies. Solutions being put forward include evacuating the precast facility while boats carrying explosives in the berths are being unloaded.

Council planning executives are advising the committee to approve it, saying conditions for planning permission should overcome the HSE’s concerns.



Readers' comments (3)

  • Shame the waste heat cannot be used for something more useful than warming of the sea. Perhaps some of it could be used for heating housing/commercial developments and for industry. It is so wasteful, like the days of the huge concrete cooling towers pumping heat into the atmosphere. We should be using every last bit of energy we produce. None of it is ‘waste’.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Agree! It's amazing that some kind of scheme to utilise the output water from the reactors isn't in place! There must be some environmental or commercial reasons for this, surely it has been considered?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Some bad grammar in this article...

    It says the facility’s location will put people are within too short a distance of neighbouring sites which can store hazardous substances.


    And councol??

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.