Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

. . . of your mind

Letters

The continuing saga of the micro wind turbine in south London (NCE 15 February) brought to mind the engineer's adage: 'If it looks wrong, it probably is wrong.' A wind turbine on a big tent pole surrounded by trees and buildings does look very wrong.

I have worked on dozens of commercial wind farms.

For a typical smallish project, backers won't put up capital costs of say £20M without a year's worth of site wind speed data, measured at up to 80m, plus correlation, analysis and energy predictions, which will cost perhaps £30,000.

The Proven Energy wind turbines mentioned in the article have been successfully used worldwide for years. I welcome the new 'domestic' B&Q models, but I wouldn't install one on my house unless I wanted to make a green statement and lived in a windy location.

Before I made such a move I would invest in energy efficiency measures and solar (thermal) panels.

Microgeneration has a role to play in the energy mix but it will remain expensive compared with large-scale renewable energy.

Peter Hinson (M), EMP2 Consultants, 30 The Fairway, Burnham SL1 8DS

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.