Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

. . . but Finns back clean nuclear energy


The British government must risk public unpopularity and show leadership by backing nuclear power, Finnish politicians told a Labour party conference fringe meeting last week.

The Finnish parliament has recently ratified a decision in principle to construct a final spent nuclear fuel storage facility, following its decision in May 2002 to approve construction of a third nuclear power station.

'In Britain you need leadership.

In Finland we (parliament) took a risk on nuclear. If people are dissatisfied they can always change their vote, ' said Mikko Elo, social democrat member of the Finnish parliament.

'But Finland has ratified the Kyoto Treaty and there are no CO2 emissions from nuclear.

Gas is a product that hurts the environment, ' said Elo, a member of the Finnish parliament's environment committee at the time of the May 2002 vote.

'That was a strong argument against the Greens.'

Like Britain, Finland has previously rejected building new nuclear facilities. It had also been increasing its reliance on gas fuelled power.

But Finland has now concluded that building nuclear power plants is the only way it can make a big impact on carbon dioxide emissions.

Finland recently changed its policy on nuclear power after abandoning its nuclear programme following the Chernobyl disaster in 1986.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.